The Skin of Our Teeth -- by Thornton Wilder (1943)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4582a/4582af3e098443abb3ad540508df52f986716207" alt=""
Honestly, I have no idea where to begin with trying to summarize this play. Hands-down, it is the strangest play I've read so far in this project (and probably ever). Playbill.com succinctly describes the play: "The modern-looking Antrobus family and their seductive maid, Sabina, survive many ancient disasters, including the Ice Age, Noah's flood, war and famine, always able to start over and begin anew, in Thornton Wilder's Pulitzer Prize-winning dark comedy."
What the summary does not prepare you for is the disorienting play-within-a-play structure (if structure can actually be discussed about this play). It does not ready you for talking mammoth and dinosaur puppets. It does not hint at the allegorical nature of the play--the family representing all mankind.
Once more, Wilder writes a play wherein the main themes and messages are somehow both explicit and puzzling. I am sure if I were a classical expert I could have picked up helpful allusions and tied together plot points so as to provide a nice little summary. But . . .
Main Characters
Mr. George Antrobus
Mrs. Maggie Antrobus
Sabina, Antrobus' maid
Henry/Cain, son of Antrobus'
Gladys, daughter of Antrobus'
Candid Reactions
- When were projectors first used in the American theater?
- What is going on? Why is the set being flown around? Why did Wilder indicate that Sabina dusts the underside of the chair, too?
- Who is Sabina talking to? Oh, us.
- What a one-liner! Sabina says Henry has a chance of graduating "if they make the alphabet easier" (72). HA!!
- Don't you just love it when a character literally tells you their life philosophy. That's one way to develop character . . .
- Thanks for condemning the reader so clearly again, Wilder . . . WHAT DID WE DO TO YOU?
- Wilder presents a controversial question here: What good is it to create when destruction is inevitable?
- Okay, so they are 4000 years old. I get it, Thornton, they represent capital "m" mankind. Mankind*
- What an awkward end to an act: "Pass up your chairs, everybody. Save the human race" (93). I wonder what audience members even did. Could you imagine the lobby talk?
- This fortune teller is making me uncomfortable.
- Now, Sabina, THAT is a monologue feminists can get behind.
- The Noah allusion is blatant.
- Why did he include this talk about actors getting food poisoning?
- Peacetime doesn't appear so peaceful.
- Okay, why do all of these plays use the movie theater as an important establishment? The movies are a place for escape, and plays love using that as shorthand, I feel.
- And another strong monologue to uphold the "good fight" of mankind. Mankind*
- What did I just read?
1. Unconventional Material and Methods
As I have emphasized, this play approached discussing the human experience in strange ways.
2. Allusions
Although I did not catch them all, I did recognize some major allusions (Ice Age, Flood). These helped enhance the themes of the play.
Classroom Implications
Nope. Only in college honors should this be given time in the classroom.
Personal Takeaway
Wilder just loves to talk about mankind. *Mankind
Ranking
Dialogue
|
Characters
|
Plot/Conflict
|
Symbol/Literary
Devices
|
Overall Enjoyment
|
TOTAL SCORE
5.0 |
|
0
|
Unfollowable; unrealistic;
diction does not match character
|
Undeveloped; does not reflect
humanity
|
Not engaging; predictable;
reader can step away from text because it isn’t gripping
|
Devices are apparent for
cleverness and do not enhance the story
|
Reader has no interest in
re-reading play
|
|
1
|
Not
consistently realistic (1)
|
Well-developed; most depictions
reflect humanity (1)
|
Semi-engaging; some unnecessary
plot-points (1)
|
Devices somewhat enhance story (1)
|
Reader would re-read with
pleasure and reminded of work (1)
|
|
2
|
Realistic;
connotative; diction matches characters
|
Fully-developed; depictions
reflect humanity
|
Engaging; unique; reader finds
it impossible to put down text because the conflict is so gripping!
|
Devices seamlessly enhance the
story and provide rich interpretation
|
Reader would re-read the play
on own volition, enthusiastically
|
Comments
Post a Comment